On a moral level, Darnay made the right decision. His intention was to rescue his uncle's faithful servant Gabelle from being killed by the revolutionaries. Gabelle personally begged him to save his life. So on moral grounds, Darnay was in the right, since he is motivated by compassion.
However, was it necessarily wise to go to Paris at that time? No, because Darnay's position as an aristocrat pretty much ensured that he would be arrested the moment he set foot in France, so any attempt to save Gabelle was doomed. Even Defarge wonders why Darnay would be so foolish as to return to revolutionary France.
So, Darnay's decision to return says much about him as a character: it reveals his noble spirit and compassion, as well as his naivete. It was ultimately an unwise decision, even if it was motivated by good intentions.
Sunday, September 16, 2018
Did Charles Darnay make the right decision by returning to France in A Tale of Two Cities?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
What is the theme of the chapter Lead?
Primo Levi's complex probing of the Holocaust, including his survival of Auschwitz and pre- and post-war life, is organized around indiv...
-
The statement "Development policy needs to be about poor people, not just poor countries," carries a lot of baggage. Let's dis...
-
"Mistaken Identity" is an amusing anecdote recounted by the famous author Mark Twain about an experience he once had while traveli...
-
Primo Levi's complex probing of the Holocaust, including his survival of Auschwitz and pre- and post-war life, is organized around indiv...
-
De Gouges's Declaration of the Rights of Woman was enormously influential. We can see its influences on early English feminist Mary Woll...
-
As if Hamlet were not obsessed enough with death, his uncovering of the skull of Yorick, the court jester from his youth, really sets him of...
-
In both "Volar" and "A Wall of Fire Rising," the characters are impacted by their environments, and this is indeed refle...
No comments:
Post a Comment