Sunday, March 4, 2012

In act 4 of The Crucible, how has Parris changed? Why doesn’t the news that Abigail and Mercy have left town affect the decision of the court? How is Danforth a victim of his own logic?

Act 4 of The Crucible marks several important developments, including changes in the perspectives of Reverend Parris and Judge Danforth. Although the authorities become aware of several serious incidents, they decide to stay with the path to which they have already committed. Reverend Parris, distraught and emaciated, has learned that Abigail and Mary have not only fled but also stolen money from him. Recognizing that their action indicates they have been lying, he seeks to postpone the hangings scheduled for the next day. Danforth, however, refuses to do any such thing. He argues that continuing the proceedings is imperative to maintaining public confidence in the court’s actions and forestalling any possible resistance, such as that which occurred in Andover. It is clear, however, that he is concerned more for his reputation and that he has mixed up his position with the larger institution of the court.

No comments:

Post a Comment

What is the theme of the chapter Lead?

Primo Levi's complex probing of the Holocaust, including his survival of Auschwitz and pre- and post-war life, is organized around indiv...