Saturday, September 30, 2017

Was Warren G. Harding as bad a president as most historians claim?

The short answer is—yes. Let's look at the evidence. First of all, Harding himself was critical of his administration. In a moment of candor, he admitted that he was unfit for the office of President and shouldn't have been in the White House to begin with.
Additionally, his short term in office was plagued by rampant corruption—most notoriously, the Teapot Dome scandal—which he did little or nothing to stop. While Harding's associates plundered the government's coffers, he preferred to indulge in his hobbies: golf, poker, and serial adultery. (His father once told him that, if he'd been a born a girl, he'd be pregnant all the time—as he wouldn't be able to say no). As Harding freely admitted, he could handle his enemies; it was his supposed friends who kept him awake at nights.
In the realm of foreign affairs, Harding presided over the beginning of a period of isolationism. During this period, the United States retreated from a position of influence on the international stage, helping to pave the way for the rise of fascism in the 1930s. Though Harding wasn't personally responsible for the mood of isolationism that dominated the country, he did nothing to challenge it. He argued that America should enter a period of "normalcy," characterized by a period in which the US didn't engage directly in foreign affairs, but rather looked after itself and its own interests.
On the whole, one would have to say that the historical consensus is absolutely right: amiable though he undoubtedly was, Warren Gamaliel Harding, 29th President of the United States, wasn't a good leader.

Friday, September 29, 2017

Who was Ratan?

Ratan is a simple, spontaneous, and innocent girl in Tagore's short story The Postmaster. A teenage orphan, she lives in the village of Ulapur, in Bengal. She does the household chores and keeps the postmaster company. She engages him in conversation and shares family stories.
The finely crafted narrative describes the emotional bond that Ratan develops for her master. While nursing him to health after an ailment, the naive girl assumes that she has become an integral part of his life. The myth shatters when all "Dada" offers her is money and recommendations.
Tagore does not define the relationship between Ratan and the postmaster, but the reader does get the impression of an unreciprocated affection. Ratan's loneliness and despair reflect the plight of many young, village girls in 19th century Bengal when it was common for girls to be married off by the age of ten years.

How do the authors of One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest (Ken Kesey) and Shawshank Redemption (Frank Darabont) explore the ability of an individual to escape institutionalization?

In One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, institutionalization is portrayed though the mental ward, which many of the patients confine themselves to voluntarily. Yet the safety of the mental institution is riddled with control and humiliation, with patients being controlled by solitary confinement, verbal and physical abuse, and horrific medical practices, like electroshock therapy or lobotomies. When McMurphy attempts to escape this safe but manipulative institutionalization, the entire culture of the mental ward shifts as other patients attempt to escape the control placed on them, too. But because the institution is so powerful and cruel, this escape is portrayed as a struggle for one's life and dignity that most cannot survive.
The Shawshank Redemption portrays institutionalization as an unforgiving force that characters either control or are controlled by. The ability to escape institutionalization is not determined by morality or one's actions. Because the system is so corrupt, many cruel and undeserving people escape this institutionalization while innocent people, like Andy, are confined for decades. Yet in the story, the fight to escape institutionalization is portrayed as more important than the escape itself. Fighting for one's dignity and freedom is not always successful, but the hope it provides redeems characters like Andy and Red from the confinement they experience in prison.

What are the similarities between the movie and the book The Outsiders by S. E. Hinton?

The movie version of S.E. Hinton's novel The Outsiders does have many differences from the book; however, in terms of basic storyline, it is similar enough to the original work to be liked by fans. The big plot points like Darry being the reason Ponyboy runs away with Johnny in the first place are still the same. The attack at the park resulting in the death of Bob, which forces Ponyboy and Johnny to flee town to escape police custody also remains the same. Just like in the book, Dally plays an important part in helping Ponyboy and Johnny while they are on the run. The resulting fire at the church and the deaths of both Dally and Johnny are also depicted in the same way as Hinton's original.
Beyond the big plot points, some of the same themes can be connected from the movie to the book as well. In both works, the loss of Ponyboy's parents causes him to form tight bonds with his friends. The movie also does a good job of depicting the struggles the Greasers face as outcasts from society.

Analyze the content, form, and meaning of the poem "We Wear the Mask." That is, explain the poem—translate it into prose; describe its genre; and describe its poetic conventions, including figurative language, rhyme scheme, diction, and rhythm. Provide specific quotes for evidence and explain how the poet's choices all add up to the poem's meaning or theme. explain the poem by translating it into prose (sentences in a paragraph) identify its genre point out several examples of figurative language explain its rhyme scheme and/or describe its rhythm describe the diction explain the theme

A translation of this poem (with rhythm and rhyme sacrificed for clarity of meaning) might read as follows:

We wear the mask that grins and lies,It hides our cheeks and shades our eyes,—This is the price we have to pay in order to hide our real faces and emotions;We have to hide our torn and bleeding hearts with a smile,And with our mouths we have to be careful not to say the wrong things.Why should we allow the world to know our real faces,And see every sigh and tear of our sadness?No, let them only see us, whileWe wear the mask.We smile, but, O great Christ, our criesTo you we sing from tortured souls.We sing, but oh the earth is a horrible placeBeneath our feet, and the road we have to travel is long;But let the world dream otherwise and think that everything is fine,We wear the mask!

In summary, this poem, published in 1896, is about how black Americans had to put on a mask and pretend to be content with what they had and with the way they were treated. They were not allowed to show their true faces, express their own culture, or show the sadness of their hearts, because otherwise white people would punish, alienate, and abuse them even more.
In terms of the genre of the poem, we might say that it qualifies as a lyric poem. A lyric poem is typically written in the first person (Dunbar's poem is written in the first person collective, as indicated by the repetition of "We") and is an expression of personal, heartfelt emotions. The emotions in Dunbar's poem are perhaps a mixture of sadness, frustration, and anger.
There are several examples of figurative language in this poem. For example, the mask itself is not a literal mask but a symbolic mask, representing the pretenses that black Americans had to adopt in order to fit in, as best they could, to an institutionally racist white culture. The reference to "torn and bleeding hearts" is a metaphor representing how sad many black Americans were behind "the mask." The adjective "torn" also suggests that there had been a violence inflicted upon them. In the second stanza, there is a rhetorical question: "Why should the world ... count ... all our tears and sighs?" With this rhetorical question, the speaker wants to make the point that he and other black Americans should not give the world the satisfaction of seeing or knowing the measure of the sadness and pain which it has caused.
The poem has a strong rhythm, established through lots of rhyming couplets ("lies/eyes . . . guile/smile") and also through a regular syllabic meter. Every line has eight syllables, except for the final line of stanza two and the final line of stanza three, which, in both cases, is, "We wear the mask." The fact that the rhythm is interrupted makes this line, each time, stand out.

In terms of diction, the poem is full of juxtapositions. On one hand there is language like "grin," "smile," and "sing," and on the other we have "lies," "bleeding," and "tears." This constant juxtaposition of words points to the fact that black Americans had to pretend to be content and wear the mask while really being sad and in pain behind the mask.

The most obvious theme of the poem is racism and how racism has inflicted violence upon black Americans and compelled them to adopt masks to fit in, rather than allowing them to express their true selves freely.

How did Ferdinand declare his love to Miranda in The Tempest?

In act 2, scene 2 of Shakespeare's The Tempest, Ferdinand, the Prince of Naples, and Prospero's daughter, Miranda, meet for the first time, and, as Prospero says,

PROSPERO: . . . At the first sightThey have changed eyes . . . . (1.2.523–524)

It's love at first sight.
Miranda sees Ferdinand first, calling him "divine," and a few lines later she admits the following:

MIRANDA: ThisIs the third man that e'er I saw, the firstThat e'er I sighed for. . . . (1.2.527–529)

But even after Prospero advises her to reserve judgment until she's seen other men, he says the following:

PROSPERO: Thou think'st there is no more such shapes as he,Having seen but him and Caliban. Foolish wench!To th’ most of men this is a Caliban,And they to him are angels. (1.2.574–577)

Miranda is pretty sure that Ferdinand is the man for her:

MIRANDA: My affectionsAre then most humble. I have no ambitionTo see a goodlier man. (1.2.578–580)

Meanwhile, Ferdinand is equally smitten with Miranda:

FERDINAND: Most sure, the goddessOn whom these airs attend! (1.2.498–499)

Having just met her, Ferdinand asks her a seemingly abrupt question:

FERDINAND: . . . My prime request,Which I do last pronounce, is—O you wonder!—If you be maid or no? (1.2.503–505)

Miranda responds,

MIRANDA: No wonder, sir,But certainly a maid. (1.2.506–507)

Then after some conversation with Prospero about Ferdinand's father, the King of Naples, Ferdinand comes to the point:

FERDINAND: O, if a virgin,And your affection not gone forth, I'll make youThe Queen of Naples. (1.2.531–533)

Neither Ferdinand or Miranda knows the other's name, and the word "love" is not spoken by either Miranda or Ferdinand in this scene.
But in act 3, scene 1, the "log stacking" scene, Ferdinand finally asks her name, and she tells him.
Miranda remembers that Prospero told her not to talk to Ferdinand, but it's too late for that now.

MIRANDA: Do you love me? (3.1.78)

Not one to give a simple answer to a simple question, Ferdinand finally tells her,

FERDINAND: O heaven, O earth, bear witness to this sound,And crown what I profess with kind eventIf I speak true! If hollowly invertWhat best is boded me to mischief! I,Beyond all limit of what else i'th’ world,Do love, prize, honour you. (3.1.79–84)

Now that she knows how Ferdinand feels, she takes charge of the situation:

MIRANDA: . . . I am your wife, if you will marry me.If not, I'll die your maid: to be your fellowYou may deny me, but I'll be your servantWhether you will or no. (3.1.97–100)

Again, Ferdinand has trouble answering directly, so Miranda simplifies the question for him:

MIRANDA: My husband then? [3.1.103]
FERDINAND: Ay, with a heart as willingAs bondage e'er of freedom . . . (3.1.104–105)

They seal their engagement, and she still doesn't know his name. Ferdinand never tells her his name, and she doesn't hear his name spoken by anybody else until Prospero addresses him by name in act 4 (4.1.8).

What does Jack suggest as a way to keep the beast happy?

In chapter 10, the boys wonder how they might kill the beast. Jack responds by suggesting that they "leave the mountain alone ... and give it the head if you go hunting.” The instruction to "leave the mountain alone" is probably intended more for their own safety than to keep the beast happy, but, nonetheless, this might be one way to keep it happy. The mountain is very much the beast's territory, and like many a wild animal, the beast will become hostile to anyone who invades.
The more explicit suggestion that Jack makes, however, to keep the beast happy, is to "give it the head." The idea here is to give the sow's head as a kind of sacrifice, or offering to the beast. Such animal sacrifices have long been a feature of many religions, and the sacrifice is usually presented to appease, or demonstrate subservience before a god. This is exactly what Jack hopes to achieve with the offering of the pig's head. He wants to appease the anger of the beast and at the same time acknowledge his subservience to the beast.

What is a structural analysis of the poem "Remember"?

Structural Analysis of "Remember"
(New Criticism)
When performing a structural analysis for "Remember," the four things that dominate our attention are the allusion she uses in line 2; the punctuation she uses in two or three troublesome spots; the syntax (sentence construction and grammatical relationships) and diction, which includes vocabulary, she has chosen; and the sounds of individual phonemes (letters) within words and lines that modulate (regulate) the moods of the poem: sound = mood.
SOUNDS
It was well established by Edmund Spenser, if not earlier, that the sound of the words a poet selects regulates the mood of the poem by providing harshness or softness and by slowing down progress through words or between words or by speeding progress up. The various characteristics of various phonemes create natural stops, naturally softened sounds, naturally flowing tones, or natural elongation of sounds. Christina Rossetti capitalizes upon these qualities in her diction choices (choices which, by necessity, also effect her poetic syntax) to vary the mood within the sonnet, "Remember."
SYNTAX
Poetic syntax can be governed by considerations other than meaning. Creation of poetic mood--which is the emotional response elicited from the reader by the poem--through the use of phonetic sounds (sounds of letters) can govern poetic syntax. To illustrate, if one set of words conveying the desired meaning in a romantic poem has many sounds that stop the flow through and between words, like /t/ /p/ /d/, then the romantic, dreamy mood will be lessened. If another set of words conveying the desired meaning has many sounds that elongate or soften the flow, like /m/ /w/ /ou/, then the romantic, dreamy mood is heightened. A skilled poet will select the latter set of words, a choice that may require the use of techniques in rhetoric to develop a syntactically sound poetic sentence.
PUNCTUATION
In conjunction with syntax, punctuation will be selected for the function it performs in governing the meaning of the syntactical arrangement of words in a sentence. For instance, a colon will indicate that what follows is an explanation of or an elaboration on what precedes the colon, for example, "He's a singer: he sings contratenor." In contrast, a semicolon will indicate that a closely related but separate statement--not one elaborating or explaining--follows the first one, for example: "He's a singer; he's one of my favorites."
CHRISTIAN HYMN ALLUSION
Line 2 contains a Christian hymnology allusion in the words "into the silent land." This is an allusion (allusion: suggestion of something familiar that helps shed the light of understanding on something unfamiliar) that dates back to at least 1597 and that provides the title to a collection of Christian hymns compiled by J. G. Salls-Seewis: Into the Silent Land (1597). The standard understanding of this allusion--and if the standard understanding of an allusion is not employed, then the objective of the carefully chosen allusion has failed--is that "the silent land" is a symbol of and an implied metaphor for the land of death. The allusion is significant because it (1) embodies a specific vision of death as a place of silence, not horror, and it (2) embodies a Christian response of resignation to or even acceptance of death, since death is the "sting" that Christ conquered.
Thus in the second line, through the allusion, we have the knowledge that (1) the speaker is a Christian of firm and devotional belief (2) the poem centers on death, (3) the poetic speaker is religiously devout and (4) the listener is assumed by to be equally devotional and devout, and that (5) the tone is one of peace and caring while the initial mood is one of quiet mournfulness: "when I am gone away, / ... / When you can no longer hold me by the hand /."
Since such an apt allusion to Christian hymnology is used, we do not have to wait and wonder about the subject of the poem: we know right from the outset that the speaker is anticipating her impending death and that she is speaking out of mournful peace to a listener whom she loves and who loves her. The identity of the listener is revealed in line 6 when their commonly held future plans are spoken of: "You tell me of our future that you plann'd: ...." We know, because of the words "our future" that the listener is her beloved rather than a brother, father, mother sister.
PROBLEMATIC PUNCTUATION
The punctuation in lines 5-8 causes some readers problems. Line 5 ends with no punctuation, it ends in enjambment, which means that the sentence logic continues in thought to line 6. To understand these lines, you need to consider the four lines as the single thought they express. The thought is governed by three punctuation marks that indicate the meaning of this complex sentence (lines 5-8) that is comprised of two matrix (i.e., main) clauses, a clause before the colon and a clause after the colon.
Matrix clauses have subordinate clauses embedded within them. While the embedded clauses may be set off by punctuation as in "The red car, which you dislike, stopped at the light," it also happens that there may be no punctuation to indicate subordinate clauses. Understanding the significance indicated by the punctuation that is present, or absent, leads to understanding the meaning of the text.

Remember me when no more day by day You tell me of our future that you plann'd: Only remember me; you understandIt will be late to counsel then or pray.

The colon at the end of line 6 tells that the sentence continues but has two separate units. The first unit is a matrix clause--which has two subordinate clauses--that comes before the colon: "Remember me when no more day by day / You tell me of our future that you plann'd." The second unit is a matrix clause joined by a semicolon a second independent clause; the semicolon replaces the omitted conjunction. This independent clause has it's own subordinate clause embedded although there is no punctuation indicating the subordination, and there is an elided (omitted) introductory "that": "Only remember me; you understand / [that] It will be late to counsel then or pray."
Lines 5 and 6 tell us that the poetic speaker wishes to be remembered after her dying has made it impossible to speak of joint future plans. The colon at the end of line 6 tells us that what follows after is an explanation of or an elaboration upon the thought that came before the colon. In other words, "Only remember me; you understand ..." explains or elaborates on "Remember me when ...." After the colon, two independent clauses are joined by the semicolon in line 7. This means that the semicolon (1) replaces a conjunction, like "because," and it (2) connects two closely related thoughts. This close relatedness is different from the explanatory or elaborating thoughts that follow a colon.
The first independent clause after the colon, "Only remember me," seems to answer the unspoken query "Could remembering possibly be enough?" This calls up the idea of how some people in grief set up shrines with candles and flowers and prayers or leave rooms frozen in time with belongings untouched. The answer to the suggestively implied unspoken query is the resigned response, "Only remember me." Here, "only" means with nothing more than; merely; with just this. It follows that the semicolon substitutes the conjunction "because" and introduces the justification for the request as this paraphrase illustrates:
[paraphrase] Merely, simply remember me, nothing more, because after death the time is past for comforting words and for prayers. ("It will be late to counsel or pray.")
The punctuation has led us to the meaning of lines 5 through 8. The poetic speaker and the listener have dreamed of a future that he has planned for the two of them; this listener is the speaker's beloved. When death takes her to the silent land of the dead, and he can no longer speak of their common future--she will have no future; they can have no future--she asks that she be remembered. There follows a suggestion of an implied protest that might have been something like this hypothetical dramatic protest: "Remember only?! That is not enough! A shrine! Prayers! More is necessary!" She responds, "Only remember me" because--as she reminds him--"you understand," in death, in the silent land, it will be too late for words that comfort in "counsel" and for "prayers" that pleadingly hope.
PROBLEMATIC SYNTAX
If we analyze the same four lines according to their syntax, it is logical that we should come up with the same result in terms of understanding the meaning of the passage. Syntax--which is the arrangement of grammatical elements to form phrases and sentences that have relationship with each other--governs meaning through how elements function in a phrase or sentence. Understanding the syntax of lines 5-8 will open our understanding to the poet's meaning. Six clauses are present in the four lines, 5-8.

Remember me when no more day by day You tell me of our future that you plann'd: Only remember me; you understandIt will be late to counsel then or pray.

The first clause, ending with a colon, is "Remember me when no more day by day / You tell me of our future that you plann'd: ...."
The second clause is dependent and embedded in the first and is: "when no more day by day / You tell me of our future that you plann'd:...." The difference between these two is that "Remember me" in the matrix clause is excluded from the second clause, which is a dependent when-clause.
The third clause (dependent) is also embedded in the initial matrix clause and functions as a post-modifier of the noun "future"; it is: "that you plann'd:."
These first three clauses nest together like nesting Russian matryoshka dolls.
The fourth clause, is another matrix clause and is set off from the first matrix by the colon; it stands alone with no embedded clause within it: "Only remember me;..."
The fifth clause follows as a closely related though separate matrix clause; the semicolon replaces a conjunction and indicates their close, though separate, relationship: "you understand / It will be late to counsel then or pray."
The sixth clause may easily escape our attention because it is a that-clause in which the "that" is elided. "That" introduces an embedded clause. It functions as the clause Object since it follows immediately after the Verb, "understand": "understand / [that] It will be late to counsel then or pray."
A simplified paraphrase of the two matrix clauses--the one before the colon and the one after the colon--may help bring forward the essential meaning of the complex sentence that comprises lines 5 through 8:
[paraphrase] Remember me when you can't talk about our future: merely remember me because it will be too late to comfort me or pray for me.
CONCLUSIONS DRAWN FROM ANALYSES
By employing both an analysis of the punctuation and a separate analysis of the syntax, the meaning of these four lines is illuminated, and we find that from both directions we end with the same meaning.

Remember me when no more day by day You tell me of our future that you plann'd: Only remember me; you understandIt will be late to counsel then or pray.

1. It is clear that "Only remember me" is not a plea of desperation but rather a resigned explanation--since explanations or elaborations follow an colon--of why remembering is enough.
2. It is clear that the speaker is reminding her beloved that comforting words of counsel and prayers for mercy will be too late after she enters the silent land of death, so nothing beyond remembering has any value or worth. The semicolon connects her reminder, "you understand," closely to her resigned explanation, "Only remember me;" as illustrated by this paraphrase:
[paraphrase] Remember me and do nothing more because, you understand, don't you, words and prayers will be useless in death.
3. Both analyses (punctuation and syntax) reveal that a beloved woman (we assume a female poetic speaker because the poet is a woman) is speaking to her beloved man. There is no textual evidence of anything other than a conversation between two who love and who are preparing for the end of the woman's illness, an end that will take her to the silent land of death. There is nothing in the text as understood through close analysis of the two components of punctuation and syntax that even hints at the woman doubting her ambiguous love for the man and forestalling an unhappy, unloving end to their relationship. If this is the interpretation that a reader settles on, then it is an interpretation derived from culture, society, personal experience or emotional response: it is not derived from the written text as analysis of the text shows.

Thursday, September 28, 2017

What is the con artist's story?

Like Saki's story "The Open Window," his "Dusk" contains a story within a story. The con artist's story has been carefully worked out and rehearsed. The details are complex but the whole hard-luck tale has been condensed to relatively few words.

"Came up this afternoon, meaning to stay at the Patagonian Hotel in Berkshire Square," continued the young man; "when I got there I found it had been pulled down some weeks ago and a cinema theatre run up on the site. The taxi driver recommended me to another hotel some way off and I went there. I just sent a letter to my people, giving them the address, and then I went out to buy some soap — I'd forgotten to pack any and I hate using hotel soap. Then I strolled about a bit, had a drink at a bar and looked at the shops, and when I came to turn my steps back to the hotel I suddenly realised that I didn't remember its name or even what street it was in. There's a nice predicament for a fellow who hasn't any friends or connections in London! Of course I can wire to my people for the address, but they won't have got my letter till to-morrow; meantime I'm without any money, came out with about a shilling on me, which went in buying the soap and getting the drink, and here I am, wandering about with twopence in my pocket and nowhere to go for the night."

Without saying as much in so many words, the stranger conveys the impression that he is a member of the country gentry. He is too fastidious to be able to tolerate the kind of soap furnished in hotels. This grifter suggests that he is accustomed to traveling abroad when he says he doesn't like "hotel soap." Presumably the Patagonian, where he had originally been planning to stay, was a five-star hotel. An important detail of this story is contained in the comment,

There's a nice predicament for a fellow who hasn't any friends or connections in London!

When Gortsby finds what he believes to be the grifter's lost cake of soap, he hurries after him because he is afraid he might have lost an opportunity to make friends with a gentleman of a superior social class.

In another moment Gortsby was scudding along the dusk-shrouded path in anxious quest for a youthful figure in a light overcoat.

Gortsby himself is nothing but an office worker.

Money troubles did not press on him; had he so wished he could have strolled into the thoroughfares of light and noise, and taken his place among the jostling ranks of those who enjoyed prosperity or struggled for it.

Gortsby could be described as a member of the upper-lower class, whereas the young grifter presents the picture of a member of the upper-middle class. Some of his vocabulary suggests that he might have been to Eton and Oxford. Gortsby is anxious to catch up with this stranger in order to lend him a sovereign, return the cake of soap, and apologize for doubting him and hurting his feelings. Gortsby still hopes to become further acquainted with the young man who would almost certainly return his borrowed sovereign and invite him to have a drink or even dinner. Since the stranger knows nobody in the whole city of London, Gortsby could be of continuing service to him. They might become friends. Gortsby might even be invited to the country house for shooting and that sort of thing.
Gortsby is not acting out of compassion but has taken the bait offered by the carefully crafted words

There's a nice predicament for a fellow who hasn't any friends or connections in London!

Gortsby will be looking for his sovereign in the mail for a long time before he realizes he has been taken in. There can be no doubt that the young country gentleman knows where to send the sovereign or where to call upon Gortsby to thank him in person.

"Here is my card with my address," continued Gortsby; "any day this week will do for returning the money, and here is the soap — don't lose it again it's been a good friend to you."

What Russian revolution stopped Russia from participating in WWI?

When World War I began in 1914, Russia was at war with Germany. The Russian army comprised a large working-class contingent of laborers and peasants for whom service was compulsory. The Russian army sustained heavy losses as a result of participation in the war. In February of 1917, a group of workers went on strike and rioted. Russian soldiers were ordered to fire on this group and refused, rebelling against Tsar Nicolas II, who was ousted and replaced by two factions of provisional governments, the Petrograd Soviet government and the Provisional Government. The former was socialist, and the latter was more traditional. These two sides ruled at the same time for several months, and the Bolsheviks, a group from the Petrograd Soviet group in favor of Marxist politics, took control under Vladimir Lenin. After the success of the Bolshevik Revolution, Russia signed a treaty with Germany, thus exiting World War I.

How did Abdul Aziz escape the Red Mosque madrasa in Malala Yousafzai's memoir, I am Malala?

In chapter 10, Malala describes how the Red Mosque madrasa was surrounded by “tanks and armored personnel carriers.” The mosque, being in Islamabad, run by Abdul Aziz and his brother, Abdul Rashid, had become an increasingly dangerous source of terrorism. As well as spreading propaganda on behalf of Osama bin Laden, it also trained its girls to become suicide bombers and encouraged them to raid houses. It also set up its own courts to dispense the Islamic justice which it said the state failed to enforce.
On the night of July 3, 2007, the Musharraf government decided to take action and sent in commandos to surround the mosque, as noted above. The commandos “cut off the electricity in the area” and “blasted holes in the wall surrounding the mosque.” With helicopter gunships hovering overhead, they called for the girls inside the mosque to surrender. When some of the girls eventually emerged from the mosque the following evening, Abdul Aziz hid himself among them, “disguised in a burqa, along with his daughter.”

What happens in Canto XXIV of Dante's Inferno?

Canto XXIV
Leaving the hypocrites in Pouch Six seems to have depressed Virgil. As Canto XXIV begins, Dante describes his mentor’s demeanor, comparing the great poet to a farmer in winter. This agrarian looks out over his snow-covered fields and becomes filled with worry; nothing can be accomplished while the weather is so inhospitable. However, conditions soon improve and the snow begins to melt. Relieved, the farmer then goes out to tend to his sheep.

“In that part of the youthful year wherein
The Sun his locks beneath Aquarius tempers,
And now the nights draw near to half the day,
What time the hoar-frost copies on the ground
The outward semblance of her sister white,
But little lasts the temper of her pen,
The husbandman, whose forage faileth him,
Rises, and looks, and seeth the champaign
All gleaming white, whereat he beats his flank,
Returns in doors, and up and down laments,
Like a poor wretch, who knows not what to do;
Then he returns and hope revives again,
Seeing the world has changed its countenance
In little time, and takes his shepherd's crook,
And forth the little lambs to pasture drives.”

Likewise, Virgil’s spirits improved when he and Dante finally arrive at the broken, but passable, bridge:

“Thus did the Master fill me with alarm,
When I beheld his forehead so disturbed,
And to the ailment came as soon the plaster.
For as we came unto the ruined bridge,
The Leader turned to me with that sweet look
Which at the mountain's foot I first beheld.”
Dante has his doubts about being able to safely cross the broken bridge, but Virgil urges him on but cautiously, advising:
"To that one grapple afterwards,
But try first if 'tis such that it will hold thee."

As they carefully descend, Dante thinks back to the hypocrites of the previous pouch and is grateful that his robe is not leaden; it is heavy enough as it is:

“This was no way for one clothed with a cloak;
For hardly we, he light, and I pushed upward,
Were able to ascend from jag to jag.
And had it not been, that upon that precinct
Shorter was the ascent than on the other,
He I know not, but I had been dead beat.”

Dante begins to tire from the laboriousness of the climb. He knows that were in not for Virgil’s insistence, he probably would have given up:

“Still we arrived at length upon the point
Wherefrom the last stone breaks itself asunder.
The breath was from my lungs so milked away,
When I was up, that I could go no farther,
Nay, I sat down upon my first arrival.”

Virgil is displeased. He tells his charge that laziness will not help him; indeed, laziness has never helped anyone:

"Now it behoves thee thus to put off sloth,"
My Master said; "for sitting upon down,
Or under quilt, one cometh not to fame,
Withouten which whoso his life consumes
Such vestige leaveth of himself on earth,
As smoke in air or in the water foam.”

Like a coach given a pep talk to a depleted player, Virgil tries to rally the young poet:

“And therefore raise thee up, o'ercome the anguish
With spirit that o'ercometh every battle,
If with its heavy body it sink not.
A longer stairway it behoves thee mount;
'Tis not enough from these to have departed;
Let it avail thee, if thou understand me."

It works. Dante finds a store of strength and rises, ready to move forward:

“ Then I uprose, showing myself provided
Better with breath than I did feel myself,
And said: "Go on, for I am strong and bold."

Despite his declaration, Dante is tired, in both body and soul. To keep himself going, he begins talking aloud to himself; he is surprised to soon hear another voice, faint though it is, on the other side of the bridge. The voice sounds angry. Dante tries to see into the pitch dark pouch:

“Upward we took our way along the crag,
Which jagged was, and narrow, and difficult,
And more precipitous far than that before.
Speaking I went, not to appear exhausted;
Whereat a voice from the next moat came forth,
Not well adapted to articulate words.
I know not what it said, though o'er the back
I now was of the arch that passes there;
But he seemed moved to anger who was speaking.
I was bent downward, but my living eyes
Could not attain the bottom, for the dark;”

Dante asks Virgil to help him find the voice once they cross. Virgil warns the poet to keep his exchange very short:

“Wherefore I: "Master, see that thou arrive
At the next round, and let us descend the wall;
For as from hence I hear and understand not,
So I look down and nothing I distinguish."
"Other response," he said, "I make thee not,
Except the doing; for the modest asking
Ought to be followed by the deed in silence."

There is hardly a moment to feel relief once the treacherous crossing has been traversed, for as soon as the travelers come to the other side of the bridge, they see that the ground is writhing with countless serpents. The sight is so horrific that it exceeds, in Dante’s estimation, many of the horrors he knows about. First he mentions Libya. There is a story by the Roman poet Lucan, who recounts the story of Sabellus (a collective name for Roman soliders) who is bitten by a snake; its venom liquifies the man’s body and it absorbs into the desert sands of Libya:

"Where it connects itself with the eighth bank,
And then was manifest to me the Bolgia;
And I beheld therein a terrible throng
Of serpents, and of such a monstrous kind,
That the remembrance still congeals my blood
Let Libya boast no longer with her sand;"

The names Dante mentions thereafter, Chelydri, Jaculi, Phareae, Cenchri, and Amphisbaena are all breeds of snakes that Lucan names in his work Pharsalia. The Chleydri are said to move in a cloud of smoke. The Jaculi are exceedingly fast-moving. The Pharee use their tales to make holes in ground and hide, awaiting victims. The Chenchri are said to never move in a single direction. The Amphisbaena is a terrifying, two-headed serpent. Ethopia is on the other side of Libya and it too is very hot and inhospitable:

“For if Chelydri, Jaculi, and Phareae
She breeds, with Cenchri and with Amphisbaena,
Neither so many plagues nor so malignant
E'er showed she with all Ethiopia,
Nor with whatever on the Red Sea is!”

Raising his gaze from the horrifying ground, Dante then sees naked sinners, futilely fleeing from the striking serpents. The snakes continually sink their venomous fangs into whatever flesh they are able; some bind sinners’ hands behind them while others entwine themselves around body parts they can capture:

“Among this cruel and most dismal throng
People were running naked and affrighted.
Without the hope of hole or heliotrope.
They had their hands with serpents bound behind them;
These riveted upon their reins the tail
And head, and were in front of them entwined.
And lo! at one who was upon our side
There darted forth a serpent, which transfixed him
There where the neck is knotted to the shoulders."

Once a serpent makes a clean strike, the sinner turns into a pile of ashes. Their horror is by no means over, however. Like the mythical Phoenix, each condemned soul rises again, re-formed, only to be struck and envenomed again. The tears that the sinner cries upon being rejuvenated are the spices used to embalm bodies: incense and amomum, nard, and myrrh. The “winding sheet” is what was used to wrap corpses prior to burial. The sinners’ embalmed tears are the only thing that wraps around him, instead of the traditional winding sheet:

“Nor 'O' so quickly e'er, nor 'I' was written,
As he took fire, and burned; and ashes wholly
Behoved it that in falling he became.
And when he on the ground was thus destroyed,
The ashes drew together, and of themselves
Into himself they instantly returned.
Even thus by the great sages 'tis confessed
The phoenix dies, and then is born again,
When it approaches its five-hundredth year;
On herb or grain it feeds not in its life,
But only on tears of incense and amomum,
And nard and myrrh are its last winding-sheet.
And as he is who falls, and knows not how,
By force of demons who to earth down drag him,
Or other oppilation that binds man,
When he arises and around him looks,
Wholly bewildered by the mighty anguish
Which he has suffered, and in looking sighs;
Such was that sinner after he had risen.”

Dante is properly horrified by the display. Virgil asks who the man-turned-to-ashes-and-turned-back-again is. The sinner first tells the travelers that he is a mule, one who carries out the crimes of others. Then he confesses that his true name is Vanni Fucci, previously a native of Pistoria. Dante asks Virgil to inquire of Fucci what sin had condemned him to the Seventh Pouch of the Eighth Circle. It seems that Dante had been an acquaintance of his man in Italy and that he had known him to be a man of anger; apparently Dante believes this sin should have condemned the shade to Circle Five, where the wrathful are tormented. Therefore, Dante wants Virgil to ask what greater sin the man committed:

"Tell him to stir not,
And ask what crime has thrust him here below,
For once a man of blood and wrath I saw him."

Fucci is distraught that Dante has seen him in his present condition. He finally tells the poets that his sin had been stealing holy relics from a cathedral:

"It pains me more that thou hast caught me
Amid this misery where thou seest me,
Than when I from the other life was taken.
What thou demandest I cannot deny;
So low am I put down because I robbed
The sacristy of the fair ornaments,
And falsely once 'twas laid upon another;”

After his confession, Vanni Fucci makes a prediction. He prophesies that the Pistorians will oust the Blacks, but the Blacks will fight back and be victorious over the Whites. The only reason Fucci is telling Dante, a White (“Bianco”) Guelph, this is to that it “may give thee pain."

Can a deputy demand you draw blood on a traffic stop if you are the passenger? If they do draw blood even though you've refused, what can be done?

In the 2013 case Missouri v. McNeely, the Supreme Court addressed the issue of compelling the occupant of a vehicle to be subject to involuntary blood testing during a traffic stop, specifically during a traffic stop on suspicion of driving while intoxicated. In that case, the court ruled that—in the absence of exigent factors—a search warrant must be obtained, or the occupant must consent, prior to the blood test occurring. While McNeely dealt with the driver of a vehicle specifically, its application to passengers can generally be inferred.
In the case of McNeely, administrative (i.e., non-criminal) penalties such as license revocation can be applied for failure to consent to a blood test. However, at present time, no jurisdiction in the United States has established such penalties for non-compliant passengers.
When a vehicle is stopped by the police, the passengers in the vehicle are also stopped, and passengers therefore have standing to seek judicial remedy if the nature or circumstances surrounding the stop become unreasonable (see the 2007 case Brendlin v. California). Depending on jurisdiction, involuntary blood draws may also be considered assault.
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2012/11-1425

What kind of feeling does the poem "The Listeners" by Walter de La Mare create?

This question is asking you about mood—that is, the atmosphere a writer has created in a piece of writing. How does this poem make you feel?
"The Listeners" is one of my favorite poems because of its haunting, mysterious mood. There's a real enigma to it: the central character is unnamed, referred to only as "the Traveller," and we have no idea who he's addressing in the house or what he has promised. "I kept my word," he tells the listeners—but what was this? Has he promised to return to the house? If so, why?
The Listeners themselves, too, are extremely mysterious: part of this is because they remain so silent, keeping their secrets, while part of it is de la Mare's use of words like "phantom" to suggest that they are otherworldly and beyond our explanation. We do not even know whether the Traveller knows they are there, but why else would he go on talking into the silence? The tiny details in the poem also add to the sense of atmosphere: an auditory image is created in the description of how the horse "champed the grasses" in the forest, uninterested in what is going on—he is not disturbed by the Listeners. Meanwhile, the house has evidently been abandoned for a long time and become a home for animals, as is indicated by the rather Gothic image of the owl which "flew out of the turret" over the head of the Traveller.

What are the uses and relative advantages to other imaging modalities, relative disadvantages as compared to other imaging modalities, hazards posed and evaluation of these hazards, and control methods used to minimize hazards and risks for the following imaging methods: Gamma Camera Imaging, MRI, X-rays, Ultrasound?

Gamma cameras use gamma particles produced by radioactive materials to penetrate through layers of the body and embed an image on a negative plate made of a sodium iodide crystal to create images. The advantage is that these are very accurate and give detailed pictures, but exposure to gamma radiation is very harmful over time. To prevent this, such cameras are used infrequently, and typically shielding materials are used to limit exposure.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) uses high-power magnetic fields to map the body based on the varying frequencies different materials resonate with when exposed to that field. These are relatively safe, but they require high electric currents and are cumbersome.
An x-ray works much the same way gamma cameras do; however, they are less powerful and therefore penetrate less and generate less clear images. X-rays are a very cheap and quick imaging method, but prolonged or frequent exposure to them can still cause damage. Once again, shielding (typically lead-lined sheets) is used to prevent harm.
An ultrasound works similar to an MRI, except that instead of magnetic fields, it uses sonic vibrations to test the density of materials and create images. Ultrasounds require less energy and are safer, but they are less clear and cannot penetrate as deeply as an MRI. Also, they have been known to cause irritation to the patient.

Wednesday, September 27, 2017

What qualities did Cherry admire in both Bob and Dally?

That's an interesting question, because it is plainly made clear to readers that Cherry likes whatever Dally has got going on a whole lot.

She looked at me quickly. "I could fall in love with Dallas Winston," she said. "I hope I never see him again, or I will."

That's an amazing statement from a girl that is fairly committed to nonviolence and hates criminal behavior. In fact, she even detests it when her boyfriend drinks alcohol, yet she admits that she is deeply attracted to a guy like Dally. Dally is a legitimate criminal. He's such a "bad boy" criminal, that Ponyboy lets readers know early on in the book that he doesn't like Dally.

[...] he got drunk, he rode in rodeos, lied, cheated, stole, rolled drunks, jumped small kids—he did everything. I didn't like him, but I had to respect him.

Readers might argue that Pony's opinion of Dally changes throughout the story, but I don't think so. I think Ponyboy respects Dally and trusts him, but I don't think Ponyboy would ever desire to be close friends with Dally. On the other hand, Cherry knows that she is so attracted to him that she needs to stay away from him. Bob is essentially the same person as Dally except on the Soc side of the equation, and that is probably why Cherry is his girlfriend. If you could ask Cherry what it is about those boys that she likes so much, she couldn't tell you. She tries to explain it, but everything she says is so vague.

"I know I'm too young to be in love and all that, but Bob was something special. He wasn't just any boy. He had something that made people follow him, something that marked him different, maybe a little better, than the crowd. Do you know what I mean?"

Cherry is exceptionally good at reading people. That was made clear to readers early in the book when she figured out that something bad had happened to Johnny. She simply knew. That is what she tries to explain. She knows that there is a quality about guys like Dally and Bob that instantly causes other people to gravitate toward them and respect their actions, words, and person. She sees in those boys the capability of strong, male leadership, and I think that is what she is ultimately attracted to.


Despite the fact that Bob Sheldon and Dally Winston have violent, reckless qualities, Cherry admires both boys for their natural charisma, spontaneity, rebellious personalities, and leadership skills. Ponyboy is shocked when Cherry first comments that she would fall in love with Dally. As the story progresses, Pony develops a different perspective on Dally and understands that Cherry admires his independent, rebellious personality. She has the ability to see through Dally's tough exterior and admires his courage and selflessness. Despite his many negative character traits, Dally is an honest, helpful friend who lives by his own rules and is respected by his peers. Cherry also admires Bob Sheldon's charisma and independent personality. Cherry tells Ponyboy in chapter 8,

He [Bob] wasn't just any boy. He had something that made people follow him, something that marked him different, maybe a little better, than the crowd (Hinton 110).

After Cherry makes this remark, Ponyboy comments that she also sees the same qualities in Dally, which is why she is attracted to him.

What did author Ralph Waldo Emerson mean when he said "Mexico will poison us"? Was he right? Why or why not?

Speaking about the Mexican-American War, Emerson states that America will conquer Mexico, but it will be like swallowing arsenic; it will poison and kill America itself. America had annexed Texas and then gone to war with Mexico over it, eventually winning and taking the land as its own.
This war and conquest took place during a period of massive expansionism in America. Manifest Destiny was the way of the land, and the country was stretching itself farther and farther west. Emerson was saying that, by defeating Mexico, America had convinced itself that it truly did deserve all the land it was taking, and it was tainting American principles. The idea of Manifest Destiny, and slavery along with it—as slaves were being used to build these settlements—was seeping further into the American psyche and its politics. These moral compromises and the entitlement the government was beginning to feel would poison America and eventually bring it to ruin, and, according to Emerson, it would stem from the defeat of Mexico.
In a sense, his words were prophetic, as these issues soon led to the Civil War.

What are Eddie’s view about God?

Eddie's attitude towards God is somewhat ambivalent. He seems to believe in Him but finds his ways more mysterious than most. If you pray to God, says Eddie, then sometimes your prayers will be answered. But at other times, God seems to be far away in places like India or Africa, or closer to home in Fresno, in the form of a dead body of some poor unfortunate who's just been killed in a drive-by shooting.
Eddie muses on the fact that his late friend Juan—recently killed in a freak accident involving a steel roller—did everything he was supposed to do according to the teachings of the Bible yet still ended up losing his life prematurely. There doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason for God's interventions. It isn't surprising that Eddie should feel this way given that life in the barrio doesn't seem to have much stability or sense of purpose to it.

Japan had a one-party system throughout nearly all the post-WWII period. Analyze why this has been the case. What can be done to bring about two-party (or multi-party) competitive politics? Is such a change desirable?

It’s most important to note the distinct difference between a one-party state and a multi-party state where one party dominates democratically.
One-party states are states where one political party has the sole right to form the government, and all other parties are either outright outlawed or at least significantly inhibited from gaining power. While these states may claim to be republics, they certainly are not, and these states constantly degrade human rights. Examples include China and Russia.
Following World War II, Japan was forced to implement a new system of government based on the Constitution of the United States of America. Since its inception, Japanese politics has been dominated by the Liberal Democratic Party. While this could be a red flag against democracy, upon further examination, it’s not necessarily inherently detrimental to the citizens’ human rights. First, other political parties are allowed to participate in elections, and those who participate in those parties do not face jail or death. The Liberal Democratic Party is really a conglomerate of parties, with many differing viewpoints present. These differencing viewpoints argue within the confines of the party, so the principles of the representatives are constantly changing. In a one-party state, the party requires strict adherence and dissenting viewpoints are not given breath.
It’s unlikely that the Liberal Democratic Party maintains this stranglehold on power in the long run. Japan is a highly culturally similar country, and the politics have been dominated by traditional, socially conservative politicians. The Internet and the growth of globalization makes the younger Japanese generation more socially liberal, and it stands to reason as this younger generation becomes more involved with politics, they will eventually form a new party. As Japan eases its immigration restrictions in the future, it also stands to reason that a growing multicultural population will join with the younger generation in a more socially liberal party.


There is a difference, and a substantial one at that, between a one-party system and a country whose politics have been dominated by a single party despite the existence of other political organizations vying for power.
China, with its total domination by the Communist Party and intolerance for competing political organizations, is a one-party state. The Soviet Union was a one-party state, with only its Communist Party allowed to be in power. Japan is a democracy, its constitution shaped by occupying American military authorities under the considerable leadership of General Douglas MacArthur. That Japanese politics have been dominated since the end of World War II by the Liberal Democratic Party does not mean that Japan is a one-party state. It is not. At any given time, there are between a half-dozen and nine or ten political parties free to contest elections in Japan.
Like all countries, Japan is complicated. Modern Japan represents a gradual merging of ancient and socially conservative cultures and a steady liberalization wrought by decades of existing as a democratic system. Its dominant political party is the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), which is identified with conservative policies (though the LDP's positions on some important economic issues, like protectionism and insulation from outside economic forces, are more often characteristic of liberal or left-wing positions).
The LDP has been in power for almost the entirety of the post–World War II era because it has reasonably satisfactorily navigated the slowly evolving political and cultural transformations that have taken place across Japan during this period and because much of Japanese society remains culturally conservative. Evidence that Japan is not a one-party system, however, does exist. Twice, the LDP has been removed from power by the voters, especially during the early 1990s, when economic stagnation caused voters to reject continued LDP control and elect instead a coalition of opposition parties. That this coalition was unable to retain its hold on power was a result of its fractiousness, common to such coalitions, and to the fact that the LDP retained its overwhelming majority within the Japanese Diet, or parliament.
While Japan is not, technically, a one-party state, there is no question that its very prolonged time in power has given it important advantages over other political parties. With length in office, dominant political organizations are able to solidify their control over the bureaucracies that run government on a daily basis. Japan is, however, a democracy.
https://www.kanzaki.com/jinfo/PoliticalParties.html

https://www.tofugu.com/japan/japan-conservative/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/japan/japanparties.htm


While competitive political parties are permitted, and in fact exist, in Japan, the country has been dominated since World War II by the conservative Liberal Democratic Party (LDP).
Part of the LDP's success comes because it has operated as a coalition of factions where multiple political ideologies compete against one another under the LDP umbrella.
Since electoral reforms in the 1990s, the LDP has gradually had its stranglehold on power loosened. Japan has moved from a purely proportional system of electoral representation in parliament to a system that mixed proportional representation with single-seat constituencies. According to University of Tokyo professor Takenaka Harukata, this change meant that intra-factional competition within the LDP was relaxed

since it was no longer possible for multiple LDP candidates to run and win in a single district. As a result, what was once little more than a coalition of factions began to take on the character of a cohesive party.

Due, in part, to this reform, from 2009 to 2011 the LDP government fell to the Democratic Party which ran the country.
A realistic analysis and response to the question, therefore, may be in the observation that Japan is already progressing towards a two- or multi-party system due to the introduction of single seat constituencies. Would this process be accelerated through the removal of the remaining proportional seats in the Diet and the introduction of strict single seat constituencies throughout the country?
https://www.nippon.com/en/in-depth/a02301/

https://www.policyforum.net/making-japan-great/

Tuesday, September 26, 2017

Be Specific: Describe the legal status of free black during 1850 and discuss how the argument for and against slavery become more entrenched

The legal status of free blacks during the 1850s, simply put, was absent. In fact, the word "free" only goes as far as to say that these people were not considered slaves. Free blacks throughout the entire country, not just the North, did not have legal citizenship. In 1857, the Dred Scott decision stated that black people could not be considered citizens. This meant they had no legal rights that were given in the Constitution. One side effect of this decision was that free blacks could not sue in court. They could not be educated, because they had no right to be. They were barred from most churches, as well. This all came from the decision that they were not considered citizens.
Because they were denied citizenship, they also did not possess the right to vote. Essentially, what happened after Dred Scott was that free blacks were pinned in an area of questionable legal status. Native Americans were granted more legal rights in this situation because the opinion was that they could become "naturalized," while African Americans could not. So, although the word "free" is used here, it is important to consider the legal context of the time before the Civil War.
https://www.ushistory.org/us/27d.asp

Who was Jonathan Edwards's audience?

"Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" was a sermon delivered in 1741 by Jonathan Edwards, a theologian of the Congregationalist Protestant sect. The sermon was initially delivered in Massachusetts and then, more famously, in Enfield, Connecticut.
The text of "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" is considered by scholars as a historic literary work that showed the early beginnings of the First Great Awakening, or Evangelical Revival. It also offers a glimpse into colonial America's Puritanical foundations.
The title of the sermon itself indicates the type of audience it was intended for: sinners. Edwards warned the colonists of eternal damnation if they continued to commit sinful acts. At the time the sermon was given, the people of the Thirteen Colonies were still attuned to Puritan traditions, but the fast economic progress of the colonies provided more opportunities for the citizens to commit sins.
Jonathan Edwards saw instances of these sinful acts and believed the sermon would be an effective way to proliferate his Protestant philosophy. The sermon addressed his own congregation directly—particularly in Massachusetts—but it was also intended for the general public.

How does Hannah help Kit find a place?

As an orphan, Kit feels all alone in the world. To make matters worse, she's ended up in a strange place full of strange people—Connecticut—that she doesn't know all that much about. Unsurprisingly, in such an environment, it becomes rather difficult for Kit to form any kind of emotional attachment to anyone.
Hannah Tupper's in much the same boat. Hannah's an unusual old woman who lives by herself near Blackbird Pond. As a Quaker, Hannah is set apart from the Puritans of the town—who don't care too much for her religion. The local townsfolk also suspect that Hannah may be a witch; this toothless old crone with a flapping shawl and weird scar on her forehead certainly looks the part.
But Kit can see past all that. She finds Hannah's outsider status rather appealing, sensing a kindred spirit in this social outcast. For her part, Hannah provides Kit with a place of relative peace and repose—a place of refuge from the townspeople. The time that Kit spends in Hannah's company acts as a crucial lesson in socialization, giving her much greater confidence in dealing with the people of Wethersfield.

Why is the Scopes Trial more than just a debate about Creation vs Evolution and how it became historically significant in the 1920s era? (please evaluate on the extends of racial issues, modernism vs. fundamentalism, and other social issues)

The facts of the Scopes Trial of 1925 are fairly straightforward. Tennessee had passed a law prohibiting the teaching of evolution. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) was eager to challenge Tennessee's law. The ACLU persuaded a high-school teacher, John Scopes, to admit to teaching evolution and to stand trial. Both sides had famous lawyers: William Jennings Bryan for the prosecution and Clarence Darrow for the defense. The trial included long debates over the Bible and a lot of publicity. But there was no doubt that Scopes had taught evolution, and he was found guilty and fined $100—a large sum in 1925. Tennessee's law was not repealed until 1967, and schools across the nation avoided teaching evolution for decades after 1925.
In a broader sense, the trial represented a clash between a modern and conservative groups in American society. This struggle was evident before the Scopes Trial. The Jazz Age of the twenties represented a new era while the Volstead Act (1919) had ushered in an era of Prohibition. H.L. Mencken, a famous journalist who reported on the Scopes Trial, was contemptuous of Tennessee's law, its people, and Bryan: "As I have said, Bryan understands these peasants, and they understand him. I have met no educated man who is not ashamed of the ridicule that has fallen upon the State."
https://www.encyclopedia.com/law/educational-magazines/scopes-trial-1925

What are some other important family relationships in the story?

Byron and Kenny: Kenny pretty much idolizes his older brother. In chapter 2, he notes,

Even though my older brother was Clark Elementary School’s god that didn’t mean I never got teased or beat up at all. I still had to fight a lot and still got called Cockeye Kenny. . . It seemed like one of these things happened to me every day, but if it hadn’t been for Byron I knew they’d have happened a whole lot more.

For most of the novel, Byron torments his younger brother in the ways only big brothers can, but after the church bombing in the end, Byron is the one who talks to Kenny about racism, police brutality, and the unfairness of the world.
Kenny and Joey: Joey is the baby sister who is almost too good to be true. When Momma tries to punish Byron by burning him, little Joey blows out all the candles. When she is nearly one of the girls who dies in the church bombing, Kenny is overcome with fear and grief. In talking about this, Kenny tells Byron:

But Byron, it’s just not fair. What about those other kids, you know they had brothers and sisters and mommas and daddies who loved them just as much as we love Joey, how come no one came and got them out of that church? How’s it fair? How come their relatives couldn’t come and warn them?

Part of the reason this relationship is developed is to help the reader see that each of the four girls who perished in the real-life bombing was someone else's little Joey; each girl had a family who loved her.
Kenny and Grandma Sands: Although Grandma Sands is a minor character and they mostly only know stories about her, she still shapes their childhoods, even before they go visit her. Grandma Sands both demands respect and showers the kids with love. When Kenny's mother (Grandma's daughter) questions her about a certain gentleman, Grandma Sands puts her in her place, and Kenny notes:

Grandma Sands didn’t yell or scream or anything, but the way she said those couple of things made everybody who heard it shut their mouths and listen real hard.

Grandma Sands provides a firm yet loving role model that Kenny will need after the church bombing.
Kenny is surrounded with a diverse group of supportive relationships, and that's part of the reason he is able to recover from witnessing the tragedy that shook him to his core.

I am a teacher looking for lesson plans/activities and exercises.

You did not specify a grade level, but as a teacher mentor, I can help you. The first place you may want to look at is at your State Education Website. Most of the states now have a teacher portal that contains lessons and activities matching their state standards. Some districts have a similar portal as well.
There are a number of "free" sites on the web. These sites have lessons designed by classroom teachers. Some of the commercial sites where you pay a subscription fee or pay for lessons do not always have classroom teachers designing the lesson. As you know, designing a lesson for students if you do not classroom experience is difficult. I am listing a few of the non-profit or .org sites. Commercial sites with lesson plans are easily found in a web search.
The National Education Association (NEA) has great lessons for most age groups and ability levels. Organizations like Teacher.org are good sources as well. PBS Learning Media and Discover is an excellent source for lessons. They have a wide range of activities that coordinate with various media on the sites.
I have added a few more links on the bottom of the page you may want to look at. For example, Commons Open Educational Resources (OER Commons) and Read, Write, Think, and Read Works are excellent resources for reading and language arts materials. Core Knowledge is another source you may want to check out.
My advice when looking for lesson plans and activities is simple. First, ask a colleague if you are a school teacher. If you homeschool, then look to your state first for guidance and your local homeschool association. Second, contact your state and local departments of education. Third, look for sites with ".org" that have teachers creating the lesson plans. There are some really good commercial sites available, and I don't want to discourage you from looking at them. The ".org" sites tend to be sponsored by education grants or government funding and offer a broader choice of state-aligned lesson plans. Finally, one often overlooked source for materials are state and federal parks. Most of them have education components and maintain a supply of free materials related to the site.
Commons Open Educational Resources: https://www.oercommons.org/
Core Knowledge: https://www.coreknowledge.org/community/teacher-workroom/teacher-created-lesson-plans/
Read, Write, Think: http://www.readwritethink.org/
Read Works: https://www.readworks.org/
http://www.nea.org/tools/LessonPlans.html

https://www.pbslearningmedia.org/

https://www.teacher.org/lesson-plans/

What are some allusions in the book Fahrenheit 451?

Allusions are references to other works of literature or to historical documents, people, or events within a novel, play, or poem. Fahrenheit 451 is filled with allusions.
The novel, for instance, alludes to three playwrights: Shakespeare, Shaw, and Pirandello, when Faber, plotting subversion with Montag, says:

Oh, there are many actors alone who haven't acted Pirandello or Shaw or Shakespeare for years because their plays are too aware of the world. We could use their anger.

Bradbury alludes to Shakespeare again when Beatty speaks contemptuously to Montag, quoting from the play Julius Caesar:

There is no terror, Cassius, in your threats, for I am arm'd so strong in honesty that they pass by me as an idle wind, which I respect not.

In that quote, Brutus is responding to Cassius's statement: "Do not presume upon my love." Beatty communicates here that he doesn't pay any attention to or respect anything Montag has to say.
At the end of the novel, Granger, while talking to Montag, refers to Thoreau's Walden, a book which challenged conformity, and to the English philosopher Bertrand Russell.
Granger also alludes to the Magna Carta and the US Constitution, both important documents safeguarding the rights and freedoms of ordinary people. Granger says:

So long as the vast population doesn't wander about quoting the Magna Charta and the Constitution, it's all right.

In other words, the state doesn't want people asserting their freedom.
The many allusions to literature are Bradbury's way of showing there is an important world beyond the clowns on the televisions screens, and a way to illustrate that books are worth reading.

Monday, September 25, 2017

What does Wordsworth mean by "the winds that will be howling at all hours"?

Wordsworth is talking about how the wind sounds: he says it howls. While the words are self-explanatory, the context needs to be explained.
Wordsworth is saying in this sonnet that modern humans are out of "tune" with nature. We feel alienated from the natural world. That is because we spend too much time apart from it, focused on earning and spending money.
For Wordsworth, who found God's spirit, redemption, and a deep peace and joy in the natural world, this is a serious problem, one he laments in this sonnet.
The poem implicitly compares the unimaginative way we hear the wind in the modern world to how the ancient Greeks heard it: to us, it merely howls. The Greeks, however, understood nature as a spiritual force. To them, the sound of the howling wind was filled with poetry and tied to the music of the gods. It wasn't merely some annoying outside force howling but Triton, the messenger god of the sea, blowing his horn. Wordsworth would rather embrace nature in the same imaginative and spiritual way as the Greeks did than in the dull terms of his own time.


Wordsworth was incredibly enraptured with the beauty and magic of nature and increasingly frustrated with the average human's preoccupation with the fast-paced, modern, consumerist world. He uses this line, describing winds that should ordinarily be impossible to ignore, as an example of a storm that is so majestic that it should be able to get anyone's attention. However, the speaker, and everyone else living in the world, cannot appreciate the beauty. The noise and interference of modern life has left them "out of tune." In fact, at the end of the poem, Wordsworth states that he would have rather been born in some pagan society. This way, at least he could appreciate the primal beauty of nature in its wholeness rather than being constantly tugged away from it by the material world.


This line is particularly effective because of the assonance of the "ow" sounds in "howling" and "hours." It's also powerful because of the contrast between the calm winds at present—"up-gathered like sleeping flowers"—and their usual howling. The speaker of this poem feels besieged and unable to appreciate the beauty and power of nature because the modern world has left him "out of tune." It's interesting to consider Wordsworth's own situation at the time of the poem's publication. Wordsworth was under great financial pressure: he had only recently married, and his wife had given birth to three children. His sister Dorothy also lived with them in their small cottage. Wordsworth was the sole breadwinner, and he composed much of his poetry outside the house while walking in nature. We might speculate that some of the speaker's distress here is Wordsworth's own: an appreciation for natural beauty and the poetry of nature wars with practical realities and the cares of the modern world that are always "too much with us." His struggle is one many can still relate to; to many of us, Wordsworth and his wife and sister could lead a simple life compared with the way many people live today with their automobiles, television, computers, medical insurance, and all the other things they either need or want. When the speaker of the poem says he would rather be a pagan, he is perhaps thinking that he would like to have a really simple life—one without financial pressures and complexities. If his financial situation was critical, the situation of millions of young couples raising children today is chaotic. A lot of busy people must be thinking that they would rather give up all their possessions just to have peace of mind and to be able to call their souls their own.

Give specific examples from the book that show how the adults contribute to Pecola's self hatred.

The two adults who contribute the most to Pecola's negative self-image are, unfortunately, her parents.
Her mother, Pauline, had internalized a view of herself as ugly long before she was married or given birth to Pecola. In general, Pauline has adopted a then-prominent view that light skin was more attractive and that dark-skinned blacks were ugly. Suffering from an untreated childhood injury to her foot, another factor in judging herself unattractive, Pauline initially finds positive meaning through her sexual relationship and then marriage to Cholly. When Pecola is born dark-skinned, Pauline transfers her negativity from herself to her child.
Pecola's father, Cholly, is an emotionally immature, self-centered, irresponsible man. His narcissism and confusion of sexual desire for love prove a lethal combination. While his rape of his own daughter is despicable enough, afterward when she becomes pregnant he does not help her or protect her from the town's censure. Although Pauline's neglect of and hostility to her daughter cause lasting psychological damage, it is Cholly's sexual abuse that ultimately pushes Pecola over the edge.

Why is Philadelphia called the City of Brotherly Love?

Philadelphia was founded by William Penn, a Quaker who infused his religious values throughout the city. When choosing a name for the city, Penn was inspired by the concept of creating a place where living cohesively and peacefully with one's neighbors would be a key tenant of the community. Penn himself had experienced persecution due to his religion, and he hoped to establish a city where those issues would not be at play.
Furthermore, Penn was a Quaker, whom also call themselves "Friends," a moniker which describes the key tenants of their faith. They peacefully objected to war, wore plain clothes, and opposed slavery. These aspects of his life lead to the name "Philadelphia," which comes from the Greek philos (φίλος) meaning friendly or love and adelphos (ἀδελφός) meaning brother. So, the name that Penn gave the city literally translates to Brotherly Love.

During World War II, the British used the phrase "no man is an island" to justify the fight against Nazi Germany. Would John Donne approve of this?

Yes, John Donne would approve this. The phrase comes from one of his sermons, Meditation XVII. The quote is as follows:

No man is an island entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main...

What Donne means by this is we are all in this life together. No person is a self-contained unit, apart from everyone else. Instead, we are all mutually interdependent. We are all part of a larger community.
Donne goes on to say if one of us dies, the rest of us are diminished. We all need each other.
The British used this idea to support militarily helping their neighboring countries overrun by Hitler and the Nazis during World War II. Britain, in fact, was and is an island, but the British understood they could not act as if they were apart from the rest of Europe. What happened in other countries affected them greatly. Their willingness to join in the fight is the opposite of the foreign policy doctrine of isolationism, which is to decide that the problems of other nations are not ours and to turn away from helping them.

How can Never Let Me Go be viewed through a Marxist lens?

In Kazuo Ishiguro’s novel Never Let Me Go, a dominant system of exploitation prevails in a world where clones are raised for the sole value of their harvestable organs. The narrative follows students at the Hailsham School, whose ultimate fate is governed by their status as disposable clones, perceived by non-clones as lacking in humanity. In this world, this system of “donation” is perpetuated by what Georg Lukacs calls “reification of the mind” in his Reification and the Consciousness of the Proletariat. This is a form of alienation that works through distorting the consciousness of the people within the system. However, also present in the novel are “structures of feeling,” described by Raymond Williams in Marxism and Literature. The novel seems to portray the small fragments of resistance which break through the wall of reification, the structures of feeling, through the fervent fantasies of the characters.


The idea of a “structure of feeling” is a complex and subtle concept. As opposed to “fixed forms” of social ideology, structures of feeling are present, active, and relational. They are “concerned with meanings and values as they are actively lived and felt, and the relations between these and formal or systematic beliefs are in practice variable.” Williams uses this term to more closely relate the personal to the social. “Consciousness, experience, and feeling” are not removed from the structure of the system as a whole. These are modes of thinking that are interrelated to the way people understand the system and their own roles in it.


The significance of a structure of feeling lies in its relation to the reality. It forms “in the true social present,” and thus is the most relevant form of consciousness to an individual within the system. Rather than representing something that is rigid and static, it represents something that is constantly in flux. It is “defining a social experience which is still in progress.” Because structures of feeling are still in progress, they are imbedded in “living processes.” However, they are “often indeed not yet recognized as social but taken to be private, idiosyncratic, and even isolating.”


In particular, structures of feeling have a “special relevance to art and literature.” This relationship indicates the strength of Williams’ concept, despite the understanding of structures of feeling as inconstant and subjective. “The idea of a structure of feeling can be specifically related to the evidence of forms and conventions—semantic figure—which, in art and literature, are often among the very first indications that such a new structure is forming.” As employed in works of art, they can become a “form of modification or disturbance.”


In Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go, a work of art itself, these structures of feeling are exposed through the shifting consciousness of the characters. The narrative unfolds its horror in a way that normalizes the stark exploitation. Life in this system thus seems ordinary. However, there are small instances of alternatives that sometimes appear through the naturalization. In the beginning, this manifests in the students’ lives as indications of an element of specialness. Hailsham students often speak of a desire for a “normal” life. One of their guardians, Miss Lucy, informs them that:


“None of you will go to America, none of you will be film stars. And none of you will be working in supermarkets as I heard some of you planning the other day. Your lives are set out for you. You’ll become adults, then before you’re old, before you’re even middle-aged, you’ll start to donate your vital organs. That’s what each of you was created to do. You’re not like the actors you watch on your videos, you’re not even like me. You were brought into this world for a purpose, and your futures, all of them, have been decided.”



Kathy makes an interesting observation about Miss Lucy’s outburst to the students. Her classmates reacted little to it, saying, “Well so what? We already knew all that.” However, Kathy notices something quite profound. As Miss Lucy said, the clones had all been “told and not told” about their fates. Their minds have been reified, so even if they do not understand the full consequences of the system they live in, they consider it natural. Nevertheless, the fact that the students even wonder about lives outside of the system seems to demonstrate that the reification of their minds is not complete. All of these indications that a desire for something other than their reality exists are cracks in the perception that the clones’ reality is the only possible reality.


Lukacs explains this normalization of their own bodies as disposable commodities as the consequence of reification. In a capitalistic system, the labor-power of an individual becomes a commodity. “This transformation of a human function into a commodity reveals in all its starkness the dehumanized and dehumanizing function of the commodity relation.” The distance and abstraction of the worker’s individual capacities from the work itself “results in an inhuman, standardized division of labour.” However, for the system to work, the minds of the individuals within the system must somehow comply with this dehumanization.


Reification turns human consciousness into an isolated, abstracted, and discrete object in the mind. The reified mind has come to think of the conditions of reality as common sense. Even though the lived experience might be one of constructed exploitation and brutal dehumanization, “the reified mind necessarily sees it as the form in which its own authentic immediacy becomes manifest and—as reified consciousness—does not even attempt to transcend it.” This cruel reality becomes regarded as the “true representatives of societal existence.” Thus, it is clearly demonstrated that the clones of Ishiguro’s novel have reified minds. Even though they live in a system where the most core parts of their bodily functions, their internal organs, are turned into commodities in the most violent manner, they have been so desensitized to the system that they regard it as ordinary. The clones’ inability to feel the true magnitude of the system in which they live, and what they are producing, shows how their minds have been reified.


According to Lukacs, there are opportunities for glimpses at the innards of the system, even through the haze of reification. These moments of “crises” poke holes in “the pretense that society is regulated by ‘eternal, iron’ laws.” These crises are intricately related to Williams’ “structures of feeling.” The dominant system will always attempt to distort the reality in some manner, so the first task to break through the dominant system is “to understand, its own concrete underlying reality lies, methodologically and in principle, beyond its grasp.” The structures of feeling in the lives of the clones disrupt the formal “laws” of the system. Then, “these ‘laws’ fail to function and the reified mind is unable to perceive a pattern in this ‘chaos’.” These moments are glimpses past the reification.


Interpreting the novel through these lenses illuminates the consciousness of the clones, how it has been distorted and the moments which bring a brief clarity to the distortion. Even though Hailsham students know their ultimate fate as organ “donors,” they hold this knowledge in a very vague manner. Clones cannot have any lives other than what they were made for, yet these students still dream of different lives. Despite the powerful reification of their minds, feelings of unease still bubble up for these clones.


One of the most obvious theories that the clones perpetuate amongst themselves is the theory of “possibles.” Kathy’s explanations of this idea are tinged with hope. “Since each of us was copied as some point from a normal person, there must be, for each of us, somewhere out there, a model getting on with his or her life.” This means that for the clones, there is always the possibility of finding the person they were copied from. “One big idea behind finding your model was that when you did, you’d glimpse your future.” This is profound because the clones obviously do not have the same future as the “normal” people on which they were modeled. Yet, there still is a structure of feeling that pervades, in which the clones have an experience of wondering about a different, better life. Many of them even have “dream futures.” Kathy notes that “we probably knew they couldn’t be serious, but then again, I’m sure we didn’t regard them as fantasy either.” The clones attempt to live in a “cosy state of suspension in which we could ponder our lives without the usual boundaries.” Even though they know their own realities in the system, a structure of feeling in these “possibles” and “dream futures” permeates their “common sense.” Ruth especially becomes obsessed with this notion. Her “dream future” is to work in a modern, normal office. When the Hailsham students’ fellow clones from the Cottages, Chrissie and Rodney, tell them that they might have seen Ruth’s possible living Ruth’s dream future, they embark on a journey to find the possible. Even though there is very little hope in this situation, Ruth desperately wants to find this woman who seems to represent who Ruth could have become. The exploited people in the system, the proletariat clones, are not comfortable in their reification, and this shows in their structures of feeling.


Moreover, the most hopeful fantasy of the clones’ is one that leads to the final confrontation between Kathy, Tommy, Madame, and Miss Emily in the novel. Chrissie and Rodney tell them of a rumor they’ve heard about Hailsham students who “in the past, in special circumstances, had managed to get a deferral.” The rumor says that if a couple could show that they were truly in love, then they could ask for “donations to be put back by three, even four years.” This information lights a certain hope in the hearts of the Hailsham students. This shows that they do not simply accept their fates, even if the system ultimately consumes them. There is resistance in some form, and there is the consciousness that the system is not perfect or entirely normal.


According to Williams, these structures of feeling have the potential to become “contradiction, fracture, or mutation within a class.” This has powerful implications for our own world. The idea that Kathy, Ruth, Tommy, and the other clones have the ability to imagine a life beyond their system shows that their reification can be broken. Even if their consciousness was not completely illuminated, there were still points of light that broke through the fog. Simply put, this means that there is still hope for raising consciousness in the system. Being able to see, feel, and perceive a world beyond the dominant system is a complex and difficult task, but it is the first step towards change.

Sunday, September 24, 2017

What is the theme of A Christmas Carol?

Although "A Christmas Carol" is a simple, sentimental story in many ways, it has generated a great deal of literary analysis and interpretation since its publication in 1843. Various critics have found in it a harsh, uncompromising portrait of the Industrial Revolution in England, a condemnation of capitalism, and a cry for social reform. They often write of Dickens’s contempt for arrogance and hypocrisy and contend that he held a cynical view of human nature, citing as evidence several of the narrator’s asides and some of the speeches delivered by the Ghost of Christmas Yet To Come. Despite its happy ending, they see the story essentially as a dark piece of fiction.
There is no argument that Charles Dickens had an unerring eye for human failings. They are illustrated throughout the narrative, and Scrooge is not the only character who suffers from the weaknesses of human nature. His father is revealed as having been a cold, heartless man during Ebenezer’s childhood, and during Scrooge’s visit to the Cratchit home, we see that gentle, loving Mrs. Cratchit cannot forgive Scrooge for his treatment of her husband. Several especially terrible aspects of human nature are illustrated dramatically in Joe’s shop as the thieves sell the property they have stolen from the dead Ebenezer, including the shirt taken from his body before he is buried.
The story's major theme isn't found in politics or in condemnation of human nature, however, for the primary theme in "A Christmas Carol" is the power of human relationships. On one level, the theme seems quite obvious. The miserly Scrooge rejects the love and companionship of others and lives a miserable life; the reformed and redeemed Scrooge embraces his humanity and finds joy in becoming a part of others’ lives. In the visions of Christmas past and Christmas present, those who are happy are those who relate to friends and family. Simple enough.
The heart of Dickens’s theme, however, is less obvious but more convincing, and like much of the story, it involves children—one child in particular. In the first vision of Ebenezer’s life, he is only a boy, consigned to a lonely life at school where he loses himself in books to avoid the pain of being isolated. His only friends are fictional characters who seem as real to him as other human beings. Being deprived of meaningful relationships at an early age, the story suggests, is the force that sets Scrooge on the path that ultimately robs him of most of his life. Seeing himself alone at school, reading his books, the hard-hearted elderly Scrooge is moved to tears. “Poor boy,” he says, revealing for the first time the pain that his money can’t assuage. In beginning Scrooge’s journey with a trip to his boyhood, Dickens is doing more than following the chronology of his protagonist’s life. He is pointing the reader at once to the most important truth in the story.

How does Jagan show interest in his son's activity in The Vendor of Sweets?

Jagan has a very funny way of showing interest in Mali's (criminal) activity. He prepares to enter into the last stage of his life, putting his business affairs in order before finally disengaging from a world he no longer truly understands.
One might have thought that Jagan would hurry off to the police station once he'd heard of Mali's arrest. But no. Instead, he sees this unfortunate event as an opportunity to do what he should've done years ago: prepare for the next, and final, stage of his life.
That's not to say that Jagan is completely indifferent to his son's plight. He will make sure that Mali's provided for financially. And one certainly can't believe that, for all the tensions between father and son, that Jagan won't do everything he can to prevent Mali from going to prison. But for now, Jagan must put his own house in order—something he's been delaying for far too long.

What does being a feminist mean?

In her nonfiction work We Should All Be Feminists, Chimamada Ngozi Adichie discusses the demonization of the term feminism and how the movement benefits all people. Inspired by her famous TED talk of the same name, the book contains numerous explanations of what it actually means to be feminist.
Perhaps the quote from the text that best represents Adichie’s view is the following:

My own definition is a feminist is a man or a woman who says, yes, there’s a problem with gender as it is today and we must fix it, we must do better. All of us, women and men, must do better.

A feminist is someone who works to dismantle the harmful ways gender stereotypes impact both men and women in society. The reason that Adichie chooses the terminology of feminism is because she asserts that using a different word denies the reality that women and girls have been systematically disadvantaged more than their male counterparts. However, this does not mean that men and boys are excluded from participating in feminist causes. Rather, Adichie suggests that they will directly benefit from changing the ways in which the world categorizes and limits people based on their gender.

How does Mark react when he reaches the MAV in chapter 23 of The Martian?

Mark actually reaches the MAV (Mars Ascent Vehicle) at the end of Chapter 24. When he reaches it, he describes it as "an impressive 27 meters tall" and "gleaming in the midday sun." When Mark then pulls up to the MAV in his rover, he stumbles out "excitedly . . . falling to the ground then scrambling to his feet." He is in such a hurry to get to the MAV and so excited that he can barely manage to keep his balance. Then, when he is back on his feet, he reaches out towards the MAV with both arms, "as if in disbelief." He has spent so long trying to get to the MAV, and now he can't quite believe that he has actually reached it. He leaps "into the air several times, arms held high with fists clenched." After celebrating ecstatically, Mark becomes "fatigued" and simply stands, "with arms akimbo," marveling at "the sleek lines of the engineering marvel before him."
From these descriptions, we can see that Mark's reaction when he finally reaches the MAV is excited, ecstatic, and awe-struck. Given that the MAV represents Mark's best chance of escaping Mars and returning to Earth, and given that he has been stranded on Mars for approximately eighteen months, Mark's reaction is, of course, entirely understandable.


Mark actually reaches the MAV (Mars Ascent Vehicle) at the end of Chapter 24. When he reaches it, he describes it as "an impressive 27 meters tall" and "gleaming in the midday sun." When Mark then pulls up to the MAV in his rover, he stumbles out "excitedly . . . falling to the ground then scrambling to his feet." He is in such a hurry to get to the MAV and so excited that he can barely manage to keep his balance. Then, when he is back on his feet, he reaches out towards the MAV with both arms, "as if in disbelief." He has spent so long trying to get to the MAV, and now he can't quite believe that he has actually reached it. He leaps "into the air several times, arms held high with fists clenched." After celebrating ecstatically, Mark becomes "fatigued" and simply stands, "with arms akimbo," marveling at "the sleek lines of the engineering marvel before him."
From these descriptions, we can see that Mark's reaction when he finally reaches the MAV is excited, ecstatic, and awe-struck. Given that the MAV represents Mark's best chance of escaping Mars and returning to Earth, and given that he has been stranded on Mars for approximately eighteen months, Mark's reaction is, of course, entirely understandable.

Can police search a house using protective sweep?

A "protective sweep" is the method of searching for additional suspects or weapons after a prime suspect has already been arrested. When a lone suspect is arrested and taken into custody, the response officers or tactical team will ask the suspect, "Is there anyone else in the house?"
Regardless of the suspect's answer, the police officers or tactical unit will still "sweep" the vicinity for additional suspects who might be hiding. This is because unknown or hidden persons—whether or not they are suspects in the case—could pose a danger to the officers' safety and lives. This is the reasoning behind the police's use of "protective sweep."
However, it has become an increasing trend for police officers to use this excuse to conduct illegal searches that are not covered under the parameters of a search warrant. This is why "protective sweep" has become a source of controversy.
Despite criticisms from civil rights activists and lawyers, the legality of protective sweeps was defended by the US Supreme Court, and its justification was outlined in Maryland v. Buie (1990) 494 U.S. 325, stating,

The officers could, as a precautionary matter and without probable cause or reasonable suspicion, look in closets and other spaces immediately adjoining the place of arrest from which an attack could be immediately launched.

Recently, the California Supreme Court opined that the justifications outlined in Maryland v. Buie were not reasonable, especially if the arrest was made outside the residence. Remember, protective sweep only applies to the area in close proximity to the suspect or place of detention.
In People v. Celis (2004) 33 Cal.4th 667, police officers detained a drug trafficking suspect behind his home and then illegally entered and searched his home, citing protective sweep as justification. However, the California Supreme Court ruled that there was no immediate danger to the officers inside the home, and therefore protective sweep should not have been applicable.
http://www.lawlink.com/research/CaseLevel3/10862

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/494/325/

Saturday, September 23, 2017

A cube is shrinking in size in such a way that the volume of the cube decreases at a constant rate of 30 meters cubed per second. How fast is the side length of the cube changing when the area is 1000 meters squared?

We are asked to find the rate at which the side of a cube is decreasing if the volume is decreasing at a steady rate of 30 cubic meters per second at the moment that the surface area of the cube is 100 square meters.
The volume of the cube is given by V=s^3 where s is the side length.
Differentiating both sides with respect to time (t in seconds) we get:
(dV)/(dt)=3s^2(ds)/(dt)
(Here we use the chain rule.)
If the surface area of the cube is 1000 square meters we have:
1000=6s^2 ==> s^2=500/3
With (dV)/(dt)=-30,s^2=500/3 we have:
-30=3(500/3)(ds)/(dt)
==> (ds)/(dt)=-3/50
So the rate of decrease of the side length is -3/50 meters per second.
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RelatedRatesProblem.html

Why do you suppose Goodwife Cruff's family is also acting rude to Kit in chapter 2?

Right from the start, it's abundantly clear that the ironically-named "Goodwife" Cruff hates Kit—and it's not hard to see why. For one thing, Kit is an outsider in the Puritan community, and if there's one thing that Goodwife Cruff hates, it's outsiders.
However, in this case, Cruff's hatred stems from more than just Kit's status as an outsider; Cruff's loathing for her is deeply personal. Cruff hates Kit for diving into the water to retrieve her daughter Prudence's doll. Most mothers would've been incredibly grateful for such a selfless act of heroism—but not Cruff. When Prudence loses her doll, Cruff's immediate reaction is one of cruel scolding; she slaps Prudence across the face and tells her off.
Kit's more empathetic (and more recognizably human) reaction exposes Cruff for the cruel, spiteful woman that she really is—and Cruff hates her for it. From that moment, she becomes determined to do everything she can to blacken Kit's reputation. This then prompts Cruff to tarnish Kit's status in the Puritan community in the most effective way she knows how: by accusing her of witchcraft.

What are the two qualities Gardner says make up a true artist?

American novelist John Gardner (1933–1982) is best known for his 1971 novel Grendel, a retelling of the medieval epic poem Beowulf, which won the 1976 National Book Critics Circle Award. Commenting on human creativity, Gardner explained that

The true artist plays mad with his soul, labors at the very lip of the volcano, but remembers and clings to his purpose, which is as strong as the dream. He is not someone possessed, like Cassandra, but a passionate, easily tempted explorer who fully intends to get home again, like Odysseus.

Breaking Gardner's quote down into pieces, we can see that he identifies two key qualities of the "true artist." They could be summarized as (a) intensity and (b) focus. The artist is intense in his wide-ranging and unbounded creative exploration. At the same time, he is not without direction, remaining attentive to his ultimate goal.
Below, I've linked to an audio review on NPR, which does not address this quote specifically but provides a good summary of Gardner's creative perspective and helps contextualize his view.

What is the theme of the chapter Lead?

Primo Levi's complex probing of the Holocaust, including his survival of Auschwitz and pre- and post-war life, is organized around indiv...